Context:
If there is a decision table, which returns CountryCode when matched with CountryName.
How to use a function at column level so that we can ignore case sensitiveness for CountryName column ? (equalsIgnoreCase at column level)
Decision Table with redundant rows:
In this example, when country is India or india or INDIA or inDIA or any other combination with case-sensitivity we have to return same value. How can we handle equalsIgnoreCase at column level which would be applied to each cell data?
Decision Table with column which handles equalsIgnoreCase:
If condition is handled at column level, it is easy to maintain a single record instead of redundant data in decision table.
Answer:
@equalsIgnoreCase(Param.CountryName, "<current-value>")
<current-value> refers to magnitude of cell of a particular row of decision table during evaluation.
Note: Similarly any function can be used at column level with <current-value>
If there is a decision table, which returns CountryCode when matched with CountryName.
How to use a function at column level so that we can ignore case sensitiveness for CountryName column ? (equalsIgnoreCase at column level)
Decision Table with redundant rows:
In this example, when country is India or india or INDIA or inDIA or any other combination with case-sensitivity we have to return same value. How can we handle equalsIgnoreCase at column level which would be applied to each cell data?
| CountryName | CountryCode |
|---|---|
| India | IN |
| india | IN |
| INDIA | IN |
| inDIA | IN |
Decision Table with column which handles equalsIgnoreCase:
If condition is handled at column level, it is easy to maintain a single record instead of redundant data in decision table.
| CountryName | CountryCode |
|---|---|
| India | IN |
Answer:
@equalsIgnoreCase(Param.CountryName, "<current-value>")
<current-value> refers to magnitude of cell of a particular row of decision table during evaluation.
Note: Similarly any function can be used at column level with <current-value>
good one
ReplyDelete